![]() Where it becomes confusing is that this would lead me to believe that the insert can not be the source of the leak, but the back is. I assume the leak would be in front of the film plane, since I read somewhere that a leak in front exhibits as a white light mark and behind is a red light mark (I know the colour because I have seen the leak on a colour slide film). It almost always appears in the same location about 1.5cms down the frame on the right hand side as I would have composed the picture.which to me means the bottom left hand side of the back? But it does sometime appear in between two frames (rarely). The light leak is regular though of varying brightness along the different frames but exhibits itself as a slim (2mm line expending to almost the middle of the frame ending at a point.fading towards the middle) and starts at the edge so includes the rebate area outside the image. ![]() The leak still appears to be there (alot fainter, but in the same location.and I did take the pictures in quite quick succession, but in bright sunlight).remember no leak on the other good back.so the camera is not the problem? One seems good and not to exhibit this problem, the one of the others has a crack on the edge of the body though not in the sealed area of the insert (and the crack is at the top and so probably not the e the relevance below.but I will ignore this back), and I have another back which had a 220 insert, in to which I switched the 120 insert from the cracked one. I have spent the last few days trying to find something remotely similar to my problems (including here in APUG) and could find nothing. OK, this is for starters, since I will post a scan of the negatives when I get home.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |